Cereal Experimentation

December 8, 2007

Too bad Easter Island never had a Buy Nothing day

Filed under: Green, economics, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 4:18 pm

As the heirs of modernity we look out towards the capitalistic culture that we are immersed in and we see a society that has plucked the fruits of nature and turned her into mere mechanized means of production. Nature has become merely the raw material upon which “civilization” is built. In his book, “A Short History of Progress”, Ronald Wright examines our own cultural outlook towards nature and compares it to the ancient civilizations of the past. He gives us a chilling outlook of how a society’s relationship to nature has often led to its downfall.

The human drive to be “future eaters” is nothing new to modernity. In fact, human beings have been gorging themselves on the fruits of the earth ever since we first stumbled out of our caves tens of thousands of years ago. From the very beginning, the thing that allowed the earliest humans t o survive was their ability to completely suck a region dry of resource value and then move on. However, then, unlike now, the area would have a chance to regenerate and regrow before a second wave of human nomads would return. Today, however, the entire planet is under a constant stress never before seen in the history of human civilization.

To bring this point home, Wright brings alive the (not as ancient as you’d think) inhabitants of Easter Island. We can and must learn a lot from this microcosm of human civilization. If you don’t know the story of Easter Island, it’s worth your time to investigate. In short, Easter Island, as it’s come to be known, was once a lush, fertile place, flowing with natural resources. The inhabitants of the island were not “barbarians”. The culture that sprung up there was ordered, civilized, and resource rich. In fact, so rich, they could never imagine a day where they’d be without.

The people of Easter Island were also a devout religious folk, as human beings tend to be. They believed strongly in a pantheon of gods that would one day deliver them salvation. And so, the people of Easter Island began to construct massive structures to their gods: huge statues that required a massive load on the local environment to construct and to move.

Today, Easter Island is a barren wasteland. The inhabitants had become so certain of their environmental security they literally built statues until there was nothing left. They were also well aware of the danger before it arrived, and yet they continued. As Wright puts it, when the last tree was fallen, the guy who chopped it down knew it was the last one left, and yet chopped it anyway.

It might be easy to see our public religion as being far more sophisticated than those obsessed with “mythical” gods, but we must pause and examine some of the chilling similarities. While our idols may not be massive structures of the faces of gods, we continue to plunder the natural order in order to satiate our own thirst for bigger and better and more and more.

That latest technological device came from somewhere. The materials that made it originally came without exception from nature. For everything that each of us own, a tree had to be chopped down, a river diverged, or a hole drilled in the ground. As Marx puts it, the market system we live in alienates us from the means by which things are produced. We quickly forget that each “thing” we buy, mediated through the market, was once a part of a fragile ecological system.

The question now is if we will stop before “we fell the final tree” in our quest to placate our modern gods — the technological, progressivist, consumerist gods of pleasure and excess. In fact, the gods of our society are even more demanding than those on Easter Island. We have an entire planet to plunder, not just a tiny little island.

We are not confronting a new age in human nature. In fact, we are exactly the same as the human beings who walked this earth 8,000 years ago. Except we have become too good at what we do. We have become too good at conquering and using nature. While the inhabitants of Easter Island had only an island to take care of, we have an entire planet. The stakes have never been greater, and we must learn the lessons of the past, or we will sadly suffer the very same consequences.

I wrote this after reading “A Short History of Progress” by Ronald Wright. Ronald Wright places our current situation in the context of the greater history of the planet. Has our civilization really progressed as much as we often like to think? The answer might surprise you. As Ronald Wright looks through human civilizations throughout history, we find some shocking and chilling similarities. 

November 16, 2007

Its not easy being Green

Filed under: Green, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 3:36 pm

Kermit says it best.
It isn’t always easy being Green.
Sometimes it takes sacrifice,
Sometimes it means giving up what’s “easy”.

It’s easy bein’ Red, or Blue
They stand out,
But what do they stand for?
Beyond what is politically popular.

But if we are committed to this cause,
If we want what’s best for ourselves,
For our planet, for our communities,
It’s the best way.
It’s the most beautiful way.
And in the end, it has to be the only way.

But as Kermit says,
Green is cool, and important,
And Green is all there is to be.

October 18, 2007

Green Power

Filed under: Green, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 11:00 am

“She may be a card-carrying Conservative, but last Wednesday Carol Kidd,
who lives along the largely rural plains of Caledon, northwest of Toronto, voted Green.
For her, it was a first. But along with thousands of others, she’s offering a glimpse of an
altered political landscape in rural Ontario, where the Green party is becoming a viable choice.”

Read more @ The Star

July 12, 2007

Keith Olbermann!

Filed under: America, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 5:01 pm

Obviously he must read my blog!

I <3 Keith

July 6, 2007

Facebook Lending Club

Filed under: politica, society and culture, web 2.0 — mrlaine @ 6:10 pm

Have you seen this?

Lending and borrowing, now on facebook.
We’ve become a furiously entrenched credit economy.
Is the ability to borrow money becoming too easy?

How many facebook friends will be lost over debts unpaid?

At the same time, this really excites me.
The ability to easily and quickly lend money to people who can pay it back
Takes a lot of power away from banking institutions and big lending companies.
Which have become a cartel in Canada
And exercise massive influence all over the world.
The interest rate here is far lower than what I pay on my credit card..

And hey,
Got that great business idea?
Need an investor?

There’s ton of microlenders right there, now at your fingertips.

Web 2.0… the possibilities are endless.

www.lendingclub.com

June 27, 2007

Impeachment?

Filed under: America, politica — mrlaine @ 4:28 pm

Hey hey
Ho Ho.
Now’s the time,
For George Bush to go!

Say it with me now…

Hey hey
Ho Ho.
Now’s the time,
For George Bush to go!

When is enough enough?
When will the mainstream media finally say what needs to be said.

This administration has failed.
It has engaged in illegal activity.
It has betrayed the trust of those who supported it. (Yours truly was a very vocal supporter in 2000 and in 2004)

Hey hey
Ho Ho.
Now’s the time,
For George Bush to go!

The reason nobody wants to say it?
Because its hard.
It would take a lot of work to write an article, a credible article, that would adaquately detail why its time for impeachment.

But here’s a few places to start:

http://www.slate.com/id/2169292/
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/27/politics/main2987743.shtml

Yes, there is an election happening in two years.
Yes, George Bush et al will be gone..
However, an impeachment would be a potent political move.
First it would actually prove that the Democrats have something resembling hutzpah.

I mean, seriously… do democrats even exist? Frankly I’m not so sure anymore.

Secondly, it would say… Americans are not going to put up with this anymore.
We aren’t just going to sit by while our country is hijacked by a group of people with their own nefarious interests.

Thirdly, such a move would need tremendous popular support.
While very few Americans any longer support the Bush administration,
The leap to impeachment would surely be a hard, and unpopular sell.

But if a man can be impeached for a little worktime titillation,
Surely another man can be impeached for murder, extortion etc etc…

Write your congressman today.
Tell her your tired and sick of it all.
Tell her:

Hey hey
Ho Ho.
Now’s the time,
For George Bush to go!

May 15, 2006

Don’t even think of sending me your huddled masses..

Filed under: America, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 7:06 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1775213,00.html

I'm curious. What exactly is the National Guard going to do? Are they going to shoot and kill the poor Mexican who has just spent two days hiking through the desert, without food or water desperate to enter America? The man who has absolutely nothing, is willing to take his own life into his hands to come to a land of promise and opportunity. And then what?

Sounds a lot like East Germany, doesn't it?

The American economy is thriving.. Or at least that's what they keep telling us. In fact, the American economy absolutely depends on the work of illegal immigration. Nobody else is going to do the job the majority of these people do at the wage they do it.  Oh sure we want the low prices, we don't mind shopping at Wal-Mart, but just don't tell us why the production costs are so cheap.

The sense of entitlement the western world has is mind boggling.  I think it's particularly poignant in the States, but its a mindset that affects the entire Western World. If Americans appreciated America as much as these immigrants did, maybe it'd be a better place to live.  At least they're willing sacrifice something for it. 

May 11, 2006

How Bush Gets His Groove Back

Filed under: America, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 3:37 am

*Lets take a trip to Fantasyland and imagine what could be…*

Imagine Bush gets on TV tomorrow. Your favorite primetime reality show is briefly interrupted for this important word from the Oval Office. The Camera pans in, and you watch as the familiar face of your American president comes into focus. At first, you sigh, getting ready to change the channel, when suddenly, you stop, something keeps you interested.. you notice a sincerity about him you haven't seen before.

And then he speaks. His tone confident, his eyes honest and his gaze unwavering. The President begins to share a part of himself with the American people. Not the scripted words of someone else removing every scrap of humanity from the man on the screen, but rather, the truth, spoken by a man, a leader seeking only the best for those he leads.

He begins to share his sincere beliefs in the build up to war.  He tells us of his honest convictions of the Iraqi threat and the need of American intervention.  And then, with a pause, he admits he was wrong.  He admits that diplomacy could have been a viable option.  He admits that Iraq never had the means, or even really the desire to inflict direct harm upon the American people. 

Tears begin to well up in the eyes of a man who truly fears God.  He pauses once more and shares his daily pain at the loss of both American and Iraqi life to which he feels directly responsible.  And yet, he also affirms his pride in every soldier, admitting that while war, perhaps, was not necessary, an evil dictator, a man responsible for genocide, and for mass murder has been vanquished and dethroned. For this alone, our soliders and their families can be proud.

This George Bush, a man willing to admit mistake, is also willing to lead and give direction.  He reveals his vision for Iraq and his plan for the future. However, he makes clear, the future of Iraq must be up to the Iraqis.  He begins to unveil a timetable.  A very specific account of continued American occupation and peacekeeping, and then steady disengagement.  If the Iraqi people do not want democracy, Bush tells us, America will not force it on them. It must be natural, he assures us, and enough lives have already been lost.

The camera pans out, and slowly the image of an honest and optimistic, yet somber President slowly fades to black.

*And now back to your regularly scheduled programming…*

May 10, 2006

Here’s to Us… Mate!

Filed under: What If, politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 3:54 am

(Well, after a few days of semi-serious but mostly just super-annoying computer problems, we should be back and rolling with regular updates and blogging galore…)

We'll get back into this with a fun question…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/10/wmine10.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/05/10/ixnews.html

Is there anyone YOU wouldn't mind being stuck next to for two weeks in a cage underground?

May 3, 2006

The Misery Tax

Filed under: politica, society and culture — mrlaine @ 4:27 pm

Alright, well, I don't have a link for today, but I want to talk a little bit about something I've noticed since being back at home..

See, when I'm at home there's one thing I do a lot of that I don't have the chance to do at school. I generally watch a lot of TV. (But not the "bad" kind. My dial is generally tuned to only three different things: The News, The Simpsons, and the occasional Sporting Event.. Okay, maybe I indulge in a little reality programming from time to time..)

Now I've noticed something during these frequent Television viewings. British Columbia airs a lot (and I mean, a lot) of commercials for the lottery.  At least here in BC where I'm constantly bombarded with advertisements for www.bclc.com

It seems to me our province makes quite a lot of money on these lotteries and depends on them to fund a lot of various programs ($811 million in revenue, according to the website, went to the Government in Lottery Revenue).  These aren't commercials just encouraging people to play, but rather these commercials are all about The Happiness that comes from Wealth.  The narrative these spots are aggressively telling people is 'Play so that you can win and then you'll be happy'.  If you've seen em, I think you'll understand..

So I wonder if this is okay? We've all heard the statement that tells us the lottery is just a tax on people who can't do math.  But when you so aggressively push this myth of 'If you just play enough times, you too can win and you too will be happy' is this a positive way for the government to earn its revenue? Gambling Addiction is a fairly serious problem (See: John Daly — 60 Million in Gambling Debt). 

I don't really think it's the job of the government to be in the morality business.  In fact, I think it's best when they stay out.. (as much as possible), but this just feels like a form of preying on poor people and their dreams. I don't know if it's even the lottery I oppose necessarily, but maybe just the way the government is protraying it. Maybe I'm naive in wishing that our government would have higher standards than Joe Corp. USA.  But then, maybe I'm wrong?  

Blog at WordPress.com.